DIFFERENCES OF SPEECH ACT LEVELS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Makhliyo Vokhidova Isoqjon qizi Teacher, English Philology faculty Department of Applied Aspects of the English Languagues, UzSWLU vohidovamahliyo1996@gmail.com Author

Keywords:

speech act, locutionary act, illocutionary act, perlocutionary act, pragmatics, politeness, intercultural communication, English language, Uzbek language.

Abstract

Speech Act Theory explains how people perform actions through language in communication. Every utterance contains different levels of meaning, including locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. These speech act levels may differ across languages because of cultural values, social norms, and linguistic structures. The present article analyzes the differences between speech act levels in English and Uzbek languages from pragmatic and sociolinguistic perspectives. The study focuses on politeness strategies, directness and indirectness, honorific expressions, cultural influences, and contextual interpretation in both languages. English speech acts generally emphasize indirectness and individual politeness, while Uzbek speech acts strongly reflect respect, collectivism, and social hierarchy. The article also highlights similarities between the two languages and discusses the importance of speech act analysis in foreign language teaching and intercultural communication. Understanding these differences helps learners avoid pragmatic misunderstandings and improve communicative competence in multilingual environments.

References

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

2. Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146.

3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

5. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.

6. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.

7. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

8. Vokhidova, M. (2025). STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ACTS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. (2025). Global Science Review, 5(1), 133-137. https://global-science-review.com/ojs/index.php/gsr/article/view/2443

9. Vokhidova, M. (2026). A Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches to the Classification of Speech Acts. The Lingua Spectrum, 1(1), 34-39.

10. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15