PHRASEOSEMANTIC FIELD THEORY IN COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS: STRUCTURAL, COGNITIVE AND LINGUOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Zulkhumor Mirzayeva

Authors

Zulkhumor Mirzayeva Lecturer of Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages Author

Keywords:

phraseosemantic field, phraseology, semantic nucleus, microfield, isomorphism, allomorphism, linguoculture, comparative linguistics

Abstract

Phraseosemantic field theory represents one of the most productive paradigms in contemporary phraseology. It allows phraseological units to be analyzed not as isolated idiomatic formations but as interconnected semantic systems organized around conceptual nuclei. This article examines theoretical foundations of phraseosemantic field theory and its application in comparative English and Uzbek linguistics. The study explores structural organization, cognitive modeling, axiological stratification and linguocultural specificity of phraseosemantic fields. Particular attention is devoted to isomorphic and allomorphic features across languages. The findings demonstrate that phraseosemantic fields reveal universal cognitive mechanisms while simultaneously reflecting national cultural identity.

References

1. Trier J. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1931. P. 1–25.

2. Виноградов В. В. Основные типы фразеологических единиц русского языка. Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР, 1947. С. 15–42.

3. Телия В. Н. Русская фразеология: семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. Москва: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1996. С. 27–65.

4. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. P. 3–32.

1. Baxrom o‘g‘li A. F. PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS.

2. Baxrom o‘g‘li, Abduxoliqov Farrux. "PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS." 17.

3. Baxrom o‘g‘li, A. F. PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS.

4. Xolmatov X. X., Axmedov U. A. Farmakognoziya //T: Ibn Sino.-2006.-822 p. – 1995.

5. Xolmatov, X. X., and U. A. Axmedov. "Farmakognoziya." T: Ibn Sino.-2006.-822 p (1995).

6. Xolmatov, X. X., & Axmedov, U. A. (1995). Farmakognoziya. T: Ibn Sino.-2006.-822 p.

7. Panjiyevich S. A. et al. BEHI MEVASINI YETISHTIRISH TEXNOLOGIYASI VA FOYDALI XUSUSIYATLARI //Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке. – 2025. – Т. 3. – №. 36. – С. 80-83.

8. Panjiyevich, Saparov Aziz, and Normatov Mirzohid Abduraxmon o‘g‘li. "BEHI MEVASINI YETISHTIRISH TEXNOLOGIYASI VA FOYDALI XUSUSIYATLARI." Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке 3.36 (2025): 80-83.

9. Panjiyevich, S. A., & Abduraxmon o‘g‘li, N. M. (2025). BEHI MEVASINI YETISHTIRISH TEXNOLOGIYASI VA FOYDALI XUSUSIYATLARI. Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке, 3(36), 80-83.

1. Arslonov Y. L., Nazarov T. A., Bobomurodov A. A. Ichki kasalliklar //Toshkent «ILM ZIYO».–2013.–259-260-betlar. – 2013.

2. Arslonov, Y. L., T. A. Nazarov, and A. A. Bobomurodov. "Ichki kasalliklar." Toshkent «ILM ZIYO».–2013.–259-260-betlar (2013).

3. Arslonov, Y. L., Nazarov, T. A., & Bobomurodov, A. A. (2013). Ichki kasalliklar. Toshkent «ILM ZIYO».–2013.–259-260-betlar.

4. Eshchanov R. A., Shirinova D. O. Kimyo darslarida mineral oʻgʻitlar mavzusini oʻqitishda barqaror taraqqiyot ta’limi tushunchalarini rivojlantirish //Pedagogik mahorat. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 2. – С. 244-248.

5. Eshchanov, R. A., and D. O. Shirinova. "Kimyo darslarida mineral oʻgʻitlar mavzusini oʻqitishda barqaror taraqqiyot ta’limi tushunchalarini rivojlantirish." Pedagogik mahorat 2.2 (2022): 244-248.

6. Eshchanov, R. A., & Shirinova, D. O. (2022). Kimyo darslarida mineral oʻgʻitlar mavzusini oʻqitishda barqaror taraqqiyot ta’limi tushunchalarini rivojlantirish. Pedagogik mahorat, 2(2), 244-248.

7. Baxrom o‘g‘li A. F. PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS.

8. Baxrom o‘g‘li, Abduxoliqov Farrux. "PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS." 17.

9. Baxrom o‘g‘li, A. F. PRELIMINARY SOIL ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL RECULTIVATION LANDS.