THE MANIFESTATION OF PRAGMATIC PRESUPPOSITION IN NEWSPAPER HEADLINES THROUGH STYLISTIC DEVICES (METAPHOR, METONYMY, IRONY, ETC.) WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF COMPARED LANGUAGES
Keywords:
newspaper headlines, journalistic language, pragmatic presupposition, stylistic devices, communicative effectiveness, metaphor, metonymy, ironic expression, contextual understanding, reader's attention.Abstract
Newspaper headlines are the most concise text units of mass media from a linguistic perspective, possessing high communicative effectiveness, and they serve to convey important information to the reader in a brief, clear, and impactful manner. Headlines, as the "gateway" of media discourse, attract the reader to the content of the article and provide the first cognitive signal in the process of receiving information, with the pragmatic and informational functions of the headline playing a central role. Research shows that, along with their communicative function, headlines perform the function of attracting the reader's attention, highlighting the text from the context, and preparing them to perceive subsequent speech blocks (there is extensive multidimensional analysis on the pragmatic and linguocultural aspects of newspaper headlines). The linguistic means used in headlines rely on pragmatic presupposition, the reader's pre-existing knowledge, cultural cognitive structures, and contextual assumptions, which serve to enrich the content of the text and facilitate deeper understanding. Presupposition is a set of assumptions not directly stated in the text but accepted by the reader as existing in their mind, and it aligns with the principle of economy in language when creating headlines: ensuring maximal information and implicative meaning with minimal words. In this process, pragmatic mechanisms shape the reader's assumptions about the text, create a state of contextual expectation, and make the perception of the text more effective, since the headline serves as the first 'pragmatic signal' in linguistics for interpreting the text and reconstructing its communicative intent.
References
1. Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Barcelona, A. (2000). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
3. Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Eshnazarova, N. (2018). Gazeta sarlavhalarining stilistik tahlili. Tashkent: Fan va Texnologiya.
6. Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Karimova, L. (2020). O‘zbek va ingliz tillarida sarlavhalar pragmatikasining chog‘ishtirma tahlili. Tashkent: Oliy ta’lim nashriyoti.
8. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.10.1.1
10. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.