ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Authors

  • Raximova Zilola Shuhratjon qizi 3rd-year student, Public Safety University of Uzbekistan Email: rahimovazilola04@gmail.com Author

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, privacy, data protection, algorithmic inference, surveillance, GDPR, Uzbekistan, AI governance, personal data, legal regulation

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical and legal implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on the right to privacy, with particular focus on emerging risks associated with data-driven technologies. The research argues that AI fundamentally transforms the traditional understanding of privacy by introducing new forms of harm, including data aggregation, predictive profiling, algorithmic inference, and mass surveillance. Using a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the study analyzes international frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) alongside the legal system of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The findings reveal significant regulatory gaps, particularly in addressing automated decision-making, algorithmic transparency, and inferred data. To address these challenges, the study proposes a conceptual AI Privacy Protection Model (APPM), which integrates data, processing, output, and governance layers. The research concludes that privacy must be reconceptualized as a multi-dimensional socio-technical right, requiring proactive, risk-based legal regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Zarsky, T. (2016). Incompatible: The GDPR in the age of big data. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(4), 995–1020. https://papers.ssrn.com

2. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation does not exist. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99. https://academic.oup.com

3. Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for AI. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://link.springer.com

4. Richards, N. M., & King, J. H. (2014). Big data ethics. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 393–432. https://papers.ssrn.com

5. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org

6. European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr.eu

7. European Commission. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Act proposal. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

8. Westin, A. F. (1970). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum. https://archive.org

9. Fried, C. (1968). Privacy. Yale Law Journal, 77(3), 475–493. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu

10. Bok, S. (1989). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. Vintage Books. https://books.google.com

11. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com

12. Zarsky, T. (2017). Privacy and data collection. https://papers.ssrn.com

13. Saidov, A. (2020). Human rights in Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz

14. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). https://lex.uz

15. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Personal Data”. (2019). https://lex.uz

16. Rustambayev, M. (2019). Human rights theory. https://ziyonet.uz

17. Tursunov, A. (2021). Digital law development. https://cyberleninka.ru

18. OECD. (2019). AI principles. https://oecd.ai

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07