THE ROLE OF MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN ASSESSING THE UNCERTAINTY OF FLOW STANDARDS AND THE ASSOCIATED RISKS

Authors

  • Bekmurotov Chori Abdullayevich ¹ Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Associate Professor of the Department of Metrology, Technical Regulation, Standardization and Certification, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Technical Sciences. Author
  • Avezov Nodirbek Egambergonovich xz ² Uzbekistan National Metrology Institute, State Institution — Specialist, Independent Researcher Author
  • Inagamdjanov Doniyor Tuxtamuratovich ² Uzbekistan National Metrology Institute, State Institution — Specialist, Independent Researcher Author
  • Usmonov Hamzali Qambarali o‘g‘li ² Uzbekistan National Metrology Institute, State Institution — Specialist, Independent Researcher Author

Keywords:

flow standard, measurement uncertainty, mathematical modeling, analysis of measurement results, risks, accuracy.

Abstract

Flow standards (standards for measuring gas or liquid flow rates) occupy a central position in the metrological system. Accurate assessment of their uncertainty is essential for reliable calibration, industrial accounting, and commercial measurement operations. In this process, mathematical modeling plays a decisive role.

Mathematical models used in flow determination enable the study of uncertainty sources, the influence of parameters, and the mechanisms of uncertainty propagation. At the same time, factors such as incorrect model selection, errors in input parameters, neglect of correlations, numerical computation inaccuracies, and failure to validate model results against experimental data can adversely affect uncertainty estimates. This article proposes approaches aimed at mitigating these risks and enhancing the reliability of flow standards.

References

1. RMG 43–2001. State System for Ensuring the Uniformity of Measurements (GSI). Application of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. — Moscow: Standartinform, 2003.

2. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of Measurement — Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).

3. Kremlevsky, P.P. Flowmeters and Quantity Counters of Substances. — Saint Petersburg: Polytechnika, 2013.

4. Kozlov, V.I., Suslov, A.D. Methods and Instruments for Measuring Flow Rate and Quantity of Liquids and Gases. — Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2012.

5. Journal Measurement Techniques (Russia). — Moscow: Standartinform, issues from 2018–2024 containing articles on flow measurement and uncertainty evaluation.

6. Journal Metrology (D.I. Mendeleev VNIIM, Russia), articles on flow standards and calibration published between 2017–2024.

7. Abdullaev, R.A., Tursunov, Kh.T. Methods and Instruments for Measuring Gas and Liquid Flow. — Tashkent: National University of Uzbekistan Press, 2019.

8. Yuldashev, Sh.R., Rakhmonov, B.B. Methods for Evaluating Uncertainty in Flow Measurement Systems. // Collection of Technical Journals of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 2020.

9. Ismoilov, A.A. Metrological Support Issues of Gas Flow Measurement Systems. — Dushanbe: TTU Publishing House, 2021.

10. Nurgaliyev, M.K. Modeling of Gas Flow Measurement Processes. // Bulletin of the Kazakhstan Technical University, Almaty, 2020.

11. Turdiev, J.Q. Uncertainty Analysis in the Measurement of Flow Parameters. // Central Asian Scientific and Technical Journal, 2022.

12. ISO 5167-1:2019. Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-22