TEXNIK TIZIMLARDA AXBOROT TEXNOLOGIYALARINI O'QITISH FANINI O'QITISH METODLARINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH
Keywords:
axborot texnologiyalari, o'qitish metodlari, muammoga asoslangan o'qitish, gamifikatsiya, aralash o'qitish, raqamli ta'lim, adaptiv tizimlar, kompetentsiyaviy yondashuv.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada texnik tizimlarda axborot texnologiyalarini o'qitish fanini o'qitish metodlarini takomillashtirish masalalari ko'rib chiqilgan. Muammoga asoslangan o'qitish (PBL), loyihaga asoslangan yondashuv (PjBL), gamifikatsiya va aralash o'qitish (Blended Learning) modellarining samaradorligi tahlil etilgan. O'tkazilgan pedagogik eksperiment natijalari integratsion metodologik model taklif etishga asos bo'ldi. Tadqiqot natijalari tajriba guruhida bilim o'zlashtirishning 15,9% ga, ko'nikmalar shakllanishining 30-40% ga oshganligini ko'rsatdi.
Downloads
References
1. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 'Raqamli O'zbekiston — 2030' strategiyasi to'g'risidagi Farmoni. — Toshkent, 2020.
2. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi. — Toshkent: O'zbekiston, 2022. — 248 b.
3. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2023. — Geneva: WEF, 2023. — 297 p.
4. O'zbekiston Respublikasi 'Ta'lim to'g'risida'gi qonuni (yangi tahriri). — Toshkent, 2020.
5. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. — New York: McKay, 1956. — 207 p.
6. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. — New York: Longman, 2001. — 352 p.
7. Babanskiy Yu.K. Optimizatsiya uchebno-vospitatelnogo protsessa. — M.: Prosveshcheniye, 1982. — 192 s.
8. Sharipov F.F. Kompetentsiyaga asoslangan ta'lim metodologiyasi. — Toshkent: Fan, 2021. — 180 b.
9. European Commission. Dublin Descriptors and the Framework for Qualifications of the EHEA. — Brussels, 2005.
10. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2004. — Vol.93, №3. — Pp. 223–231.
11. Yusupov A.A. Texnik universitetlarda AT fanlarini o'qitish samaradorligini oshirish // O'zPFITI axborotnomasi. — 2023. — №2. — B. 45–52.
12. Barrows H.S. Problem-based learning: An educational strategy for medical education. — Springfield: SIU Press, 1985. — 134 p.
13. Hmelo-Silver C.E. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? // Educational Psychology Review. — 2004. — Vol.16, №3. — Pp. 235–266.
14. Savery J.R. Overview of Problem-based Learning // Interdisciplinary Journal of PBL. — 2006. — Vol.1, №1. — Pp. 9–20.
15. Merritt J. et al. Investigating the Effectiveness of PBL // Interdisciplinary Journal of PBL. — 2017. — Vol.11, №2. — Pp. 1–17.
16. Thomas J.W. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. — San Rafael: Autodesk Foundation, 2000. — 48 p.
17. Bell S. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century // The Clearing House. — 2010. — Vol.83, №2. — Pp. 39–43.
18. Kokotsaki D., Menzies V., Wiggins A. Project-based learning // Improving Schools. — 2016. — Vol.19, №3. — Pp. 267–277.
19. Kapp K.M. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. — San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2012. — 302 p.
20. Hamari J., Koivisto J., Sarsa H. Does Gamification Work? — A Literature Review // HICSS-47. — 2014. — Pp. 3025–3034.
21. Toshmatov B.X. Gamifikatsiya elementlari talabalar motivatsiyasiga ta'siri // TDTU ilmiy axborotnomasi. — 2023. — №4. — B. 78–84.
22. Horn M.B., Staker H. Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015. — 336 p.
23. Means B. et al. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning. — Washington: U.S. DOE, 2010. — 93 p.
24. Watson J. A National Primer on K-12 Online Learning. — Vienna: iNACOL, 2007. — 54 p.
25. Malikowski S. Factors Related to CMS Tool Use in Academic Instruction // Internet and Higher Education. — 2008. — Vol.11, №1. — Pp. 19–26.
26. Corbett A.T., Anderson J.R. Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge // UMUAI. — 1994. — Vol.4, №4. — Pp. 253–278.
27. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education. — Boston: CCR, 2019. — 162 p.
28. Zawacki-Richter O. et al. Systematic review of research on AI in higher education // IJET. — 2019. — Vol.16, №39. — Pp. 1–27.
29. Roblyer M.D., Doering A.H. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. — Boston: Pearson, 2013. — 496 p.
30. Puri I.K. Making STEM education relevant // Science. — 2015. — Vol.349, №6255. — Pp. 1,436.
31. Nurmatov N.R., Xoliqov A.A. Raqamli ta'lim texnologiyalari // O'zMU xabarlari. — 2022. — №3. — B. 112–118.
32. Qodirov M.T. Oliy texnik ta'limda innovatsion metodlar: qiyosiy tahlil // Pedagogika. — 2024. — №1. — B. 34–41.
33. Siemens G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age // IJITDL. — 2005. — Vol.2, №1. — Pp. 1–8.
34. Garrison D.R., Vaughan N.D. Blended Learning in Higher Education. — San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008. — 272 p.
35. Christensen C.M., Horn M.B., Staker H. Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? — San Mateo: Christensen Institute, 2013. — 62 p.
36. McGonigal J. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better. — New York: Penguin, 2011. — 388 p.
37. Deterding S. et al. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness // Proc. MindTrek. — ACM, 2011. — Pp. 9–15.
38. Dicheva D. et al. Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study // ET&S. — 2015. — Vol.18, №3. — Pp. 75–88.
39. Dewey J. Experience and Education. — New York: Collier Books, 1938. — 116 p.
40. Kilpatrick W.H. The Project Method // Teachers College Record. — 1918. — Vol.19, №4. — Pp. 319–335.
