SERVICES IN THE SECTOR COMPETITIVENESS INTERPRETATION OF REACHING MODERN THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND THEIR CONCEPTUAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Usmonov Maxsud Tulqin o'g'li Author
  • Qodirov Farrux Ergash o‘g‘li Author

Keywords:

service sector, competitiveness, digital transformation, digital maturity, service innovation, platforms, two-sided markets, customer interface, data, dynamic capabilities.

Abstract

This article systematizes modern theoretical approaches to interpreting competitiveness in the service sector and provides a conceptual comparative analysis under digital transformation. It integrates the industry-based view (Porter), the resource-based view (RBV), dynamic capabilities, service-dominant logic, service innovation theories, and platform/two-sided market perspectives. The paper argues that digitization shifts value capture along the service chain toward "payments + data + customer interface," while execution becomes increasingly standardized. Methodologically, the study applies conceptual analysis and theoretical triangulation to propose a feedback-driven model: "inputs digital maturity service innovation outcomes. " The results section includes comparative tables, indicator matrices, and schematic figures to support both academic interpretation and managerial implications. The main conclusion emphasizes safeguarding brand and customer interface, governing data assets, and building balanced partnerships with platforms as key competitiveness strategies for service providers.

References

1. Barney, Jay B. 1991. "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage." Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.

2. Bharadwaj, Anandhi, Omar A. El Sawy, Paul A. Pavlow, and N. Venkat Venkatraman. 2013. “Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights.” MIS Quarterly 37(2): 471–482.

3. den Hertog, Pim. 2000. "Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Co-Producers of Innovation." International Journal of Innovation Management 4 (4): 491–528.

4. Eisenmann, Thomas R., Geoffrey G. Parker, and Marshall W. Van Alstyne. 2006. “Strategies for Two-Sided Markets.” Harvard Business Review 84 (10): 92–101.

5. Gallouge, Faïz, and Olivier Weinstein. 1997. "Innovation in Services." Research Policy 26(4–5): 537–556.

6. Porter, Michael E. 1996. "What Is Strategy?" Harvard Business Review 74 (6): 61–78.

7. Porter, Michael E. 1998. "Clusters and the New Economics of Competition." Harvard Business Review (November–December): 77–90.

8. Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Jean Tirole. 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets." Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (4): 990–1029.

9. Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Schuen. 1997. "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management." Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.

10. Vargo, Stephen L., and Robert F. Lusch. 2004. "Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing." Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30