PARTONYMS IN THE ASSIMILATED LEXICON OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Safarova Mahfuza Rajabovna Independent researcher of Bukhara State University Senior English teacher of school No. 17, Bukhara district, Bukhara region Author

Keywords:

partonymy; holonym–partonym relations; lexical assimilation; borrowed vocabulary; English linguistics; Uzbek linguistics; loanwords; morphological adaptation; phonological assimilation; semantic specialization; component–object relations; cross-linguistic comparison; lexical typology; agglutinative morphology; historical borrowing.

Abstract

This article explores the structural, semantic, and functional features of partonyms—lexical units expressing part–whole relations—within the assimilated vocabulary of English and Uzbek. Through comparative analysis, the study examines the origins of borrowed partonyms, the mechanisms of assimilation, and the types of partonymic relations common to both languages. The findings indicate that English and Uzbek, despite belonging to different language families, demonstrate universal cognitive patterns in forming partonymic structures while also revealing language-specific morphological and semantic tendencies shaped by their respective borrowing histories.

References

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.). (2002). Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge University Press.

2. Bussmann, H. (1996). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Routledge.

3. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Morphology. Edinburgh University Press.

4. Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

5. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2018). An Introduction to Language (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.

6. Haspelmath, M., & Tadmor, U. (Eds.). (2009). Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. De Gruyter Mouton.

7. Jeffries, L. (2006). Discovering Language: The Structure of Modern English. Palgrave Macmillan.

8. Johanson, L., & Csató, É. Á. (Eds.). (1998). The Turkic Languages. Routledge.

9. Trask, R. L. (1994). Language Change. Routledge.

10. Uz-FA (Uzbekistan Fanlar Akademiyasi). (2010). Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. Toshkent: Fan nashriyoti.

11. Safarova M.R. THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF WHOLE–PART RELATIONS IN THE UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES. Finlan. d, Helsinki international scientificonline conference"SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY", https://interoncof.com/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Finteroncof.com%2Findex.php%2Ffinland%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F14848%2F13399%2F26419.

12. Rajabovna, S. M. (2025). THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF WHOLE–PART RELATIONS IN THE UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 3(36), 7-10.

13. Rajabovna, S. M. (2025). THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF WHOLE–PART RELATIONS IN THE UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 3(36), 7-10.

14. Radjabovna, S. M. (2022). ASSESSMENT AND ITS ROLE IN TEACHING. INNOVATION IN THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 65.

15. Radjabovna, S. M. (2022). SOME FEATURES OF TEACHER'S NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR. INNOVATION IN THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 60.

16. Radjabovna, S. M. (2022). SOME FEATURES OF TEACHER'S NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR. INNOVATION IN THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 60.

17. Haydarov, K., Abdujabbarov, A., Rayimbaev, J., & Ahmedov, B. (2020). Magnetized particle motion around black holes in conformal gravity: Can magnetic interaction mimic spin of black holes?. Universe, 6(3), 44.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30